The information used on here was taken from Balanced Politics and appears to have more reasons to support drilling in the park, many of these reasons being economic. More than 50% of it is less than 200 feet deep. Third, is to enclose the entire plant in a concrete and steel-reinforced tomb, called a containment structure. However, for almost four decades, it has been in the middle of political and media controversies because of the drillings done in search for oil. I think our economy would be benefited by the venture. Ironically, she says the only reason she and her colleagues are able to gather data from the far-flung regions of the 49th state is because of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. Pollutants are also released during the transportation processes including the shipping of oil for distribution.
Drilling for oil in Alaska would occur in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which is a safe haven for animals such as wolves, caribou, polar bears, wolverines and more. Then ask: What is the controversy surrounding this area? No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Low environmental impacts without accidents 2. What are some reasons given by opponents to prevent drilling? In April 2002 the Senate rejected it. Critics find this inhumane and abusive of the right of animals.
The United States gets 85% of its commercial energy from fossil fuels, with 40% coming from crude oil. The coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, with the Brooks Range as a backdrop. A subtly worded instruction in the just-released House budget could provide a path for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge—one of the last truly untouched places in America. This is one of the most important issues in energy today. Alaska is also in a politically stable country.
How do you think Congress should weigh the environmental value of the refuge against the economic value of the oil beneath it? Proponents say it will create jobs, generate over the next decade, and make the country more energy independent. Pros and Cons The argument for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is economic. Still, there are plenty of opportunities in growing sectors like solar. Anthracite hard coal has the highest heat content and low sulfur content. But seismic studies represent a necessary first step, and Interior Department officials are modifying a 1980s regulation to permit them. Caribou herds shifted their calving areas to find vegetation and avoid insects. Petrochemical is a chemical compound synthesized from refining of crude oil Ethylene, Benezene.
President Trump signed it into law on December 22, 2017. David Houseknecht, of the U. When companies are exploring for oil, they drive huge tundra tractors that can rip up vegetation and destroy. These habitats support a number of large animals—including caribou, musk oxen, wolves, wolverines, and polar bears—and some 135 different bird species. High net energy yield but decreasing 3. Invite students to share their responses. No exploratory drilling was allowed.
Oil is one of the most precious commodities in the world, regardless of the drop in the prices of crude in recent times. During these months, major storms, frigid waters and 50-foot-high waves are common. This can also increase the risks of these animals to human contacts, which is dangerous to both parties. Supply chains would be lengthy, and exploration seasons limited to four months of the year. With nuclear fusion there is no risk of a meltdown or of a release of large amounts of radioactive materials from a terrorist attack and little risk of the additional spread of nuclear weapons, because bomb grade materials are not required for fusion energy. While the herd size has fallen from its high of 180,000 a few years ago, oil drilling is unlikely to have any negative impact. It can also be a great way to improve lives of the people living within or near the areas.
It is time for Congress to give the green light to limited exploration and production. Accounting for uncertainty, the estimates range from a low of 4. The technology for drilling and producing oil in water less than 200 feet deep has been around for decades. Maybe I am just reading this wrong, but isn't this the same thing? A part of the population of , and 5,000 to 7,000 Gwich'in peoples feel their lifestyle would be disrupted or destroyed by drilling. They are concerned about protecting their hunt of 300-350 animals from the 152,000 porcupine caribou. Alaska's economy depends on the for one-third of its jobs, but other oil prospects are drying up, according to Alaska's pro-drilling.
The area potentially could produce 1. This means finding alternative sources of fossil fuels may become necessary for our modern lifestyle to continue being supported. The land is situated between the to the north, to the south, and to the west. Toward the end of his presidential term pressed Clinton to declare the Arctic Refuge a. Access roads run alongside the pipelines so that workers can maintain the pipes.