The fun of results is not so much in the writing as in the analysis itself. Excessive irrelevant statistical tests detract from the big picture and make it difficult for the reader to follow. He can correct it objectively and give you valuable advice concerning the missing or odd data. Research papers present the process of testing hypotheses or models and how their findings help shape or advance a particular research topic. The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. The reader must be able to follow the flow of the data; otherwise, the paper will mean nothing and most likely frustrate the reader.
If you find you do need to include the raw data, it's often best listed in an appendix instead of in the main body of the paper. In many cases, the easiest way to accomplish this is to first create your tables and figures and then organize them in a logical way. If you have a table of results, refer to it in the text, but do not repeat the - duplicate information will be penalized. Always assume that your readers have a solid understanding of statistical concepts. Figures include graphs, charts, pictures, maps, or any other illustration you want to include in your results. Number all tables and figures with descriptive titles.
You can also assume that your readers have an understanding of basic statistics, so there's no need to add explanations for statistical tests or terms you present in your results. If you used a software program capable of generating results for you, use that to create figures according to variables. Not enough information can confuse and lose the reader, but too much information can become monotonous for the reader. This includes charts, tables, graphs, and any other illustrations of data you have collected. One thing to keep in mind — if you create a graph, then it is because you wish to say something about this information in the Discussion section. Previous parts explored , , and.
End each statistical test with a sentence or two indicating what that particular statistical result says about the hypothesis or question. All sessions were videotaped so the data could later be coded. You should seek information from your lecturers and tutors about whether this is appropriate in your discipline. Without the level of error provided, the reader has no idea how consistent your findings are. The academic writing should be clear, impartial, and objective. In order to write a good dissertation results section, use these professional guidelines which will help you organize the writing process. The results section is not for interpreting the results in any way; that belongs strictly in the discussion section.
The method section should provide enough information to allow other researchers to replicate your experiment or study. This is common in longer papers, and your discussion part of the paper will generally follow the same structure. I felt inferiority and so humiliated when. This is the overall main point or points that you want your readers to remember. The Results section may also be divided according to subheadings, especially if there were very strong trends or if there were multiple phases of the project. Next, write the summary text to support your illustrative materials. Finally, sum up with a conclusion.
All names were changed to protect participant confidentiality. This belongs in the Discussion section 4. Coli, it was apparent that all treatments used a deterring effect on the growth of E. So your lab report will have all the sections—Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion—but with only a sentence or two in the sections that were not assigned. This does not mean there is no creativity allowed in the Results section.
You must call the reader's attention to these trends or they may be missed. This will make your science fair project report look professional and also make it easy to read. The results and discussion are relatively cut and dried. Those topics should be dealt with in the Discussion and Methodology sections. They are convinced by their approaches and convincing since they are recognized by the famous newspapers. Now the writer starts to talk about effects.
They should be clearly stated. In the Results section, it is okay to bring up this outcome, however, posing new hypotheses for this uncommon result should be presented in the Discussion section. You should provide detailed information on the research design, participants, equipment, materials, variables, and actions taken by the participants. Each result, which confirms or refutes your assumptions, should be noted in an unbiased manner to increase the credibility of your study. At the very minimum, this part of your method section must convey who was in your study, the population from which your participants were drawn, and any restrictions on your pool of participants. Remember, everything in your results should address the research question in some way, which means you need to know which pieces of data are key to your discussion and which ones can be left out. Tips for Writing a Results Section Perhaps the best way to use the results section is to show the most relevant information in the graphs, figures and tables.